Post by account_disabled on Mar 13, 2024 2:14:24 GMT -5
Based on the insignificant budget has more rights and procedural guarantees than the mayors of the cities of São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro which together have almost million inhabitants and budgets. which combined should exceed R billion in . This precariousness of external control not only affects the guarantees of public managers but also the companies that contract with the two largest capitals in the country.
In Rio de Janeiro the situation is a little worse because the TCM-RJ transformed the special prosecutor's office into a mere legal consultancy with the label of inspector of the law which accommodates and is currently led by a commissioner who does not have the autonomy inherent to a Public Ministry of Accounts as idealized by CG Leads Constitution of the Republic and in practice subjects the commissioned position to the desires of the counselors.
The STF does not have a monopoly on settlement and this is a topic that deserves to be re-discussed and the proposal to regulate the matter in Complementary Bill No. of which aims to issue general financial inspection rules to standardize the control exercised over public accounts. According to article of the proposal the state Public Ministry of Accounts must issue an impartial and autonomous opinion in all accounting processes as long as the TCM-RJ and TCM-SP do not set up their respective bodies with the company's own legal consultancy being expressly prohibited. court.
If this prediction had already been in force the arbitrary and unconstitutional intervention of a commissioner in Mayor Crivella's accounts would not have supported the political motivation that is present in the - biennium opinions of the second largest capital in the country. Perhaps if there had been action by the law inspector with the TCM-SP the counselors would have at least been embarrassed to consider reopening the discussion on the matter covered in a prior opinion assessed more than a year ago and the accounts already submitted for judgment by the Legislative Branch.
It is important to consider that the judgment of accounts can result in restrictive measures and highly serious sanctions that affect the subjective rights of managers in addition to directly affecting all those who contract with the public administration. In this sense the definition of procedures that democratize the accounting judgment process contributes to a more predictable safe and competitive management and business environment the ideal of the Democratic Constitution.
On the proposed bases PLP nº of has the potential to rescue the belief of good managers that their accounts will be subjected to an impartial and fair judgment based on the autonomous action of the legitimate inspector of the law. This is what taxpayer-citizens yearn for and demand from republican institutions that have this constitutional mission.
In Rio de Janeiro the situation is a little worse because the TCM-RJ transformed the special prosecutor's office into a mere legal consultancy with the label of inspector of the law which accommodates and is currently led by a commissioner who does not have the autonomy inherent to a Public Ministry of Accounts as idealized by CG Leads Constitution of the Republic and in practice subjects the commissioned position to the desires of the counselors.
The STF does not have a monopoly on settlement and this is a topic that deserves to be re-discussed and the proposal to regulate the matter in Complementary Bill No. of which aims to issue general financial inspection rules to standardize the control exercised over public accounts. According to article of the proposal the state Public Ministry of Accounts must issue an impartial and autonomous opinion in all accounting processes as long as the TCM-RJ and TCM-SP do not set up their respective bodies with the company's own legal consultancy being expressly prohibited. court.
If this prediction had already been in force the arbitrary and unconstitutional intervention of a commissioner in Mayor Crivella's accounts would not have supported the political motivation that is present in the - biennium opinions of the second largest capital in the country. Perhaps if there had been action by the law inspector with the TCM-SP the counselors would have at least been embarrassed to consider reopening the discussion on the matter covered in a prior opinion assessed more than a year ago and the accounts already submitted for judgment by the Legislative Branch.
It is important to consider that the judgment of accounts can result in restrictive measures and highly serious sanctions that affect the subjective rights of managers in addition to directly affecting all those who contract with the public administration. In this sense the definition of procedures that democratize the accounting judgment process contributes to a more predictable safe and competitive management and business environment the ideal of the Democratic Constitution.
On the proposed bases PLP nº of has the potential to rescue the belief of good managers that their accounts will be subjected to an impartial and fair judgment based on the autonomous action of the legitimate inspector of the law. This is what taxpayer-citizens yearn for and demand from republican institutions that have this constitutional mission.